![]() ![]() You could slice the sections along the mid-point and have a 4-piece body that would allow work on the car by only removing the top sections and, with the engine cover section having quick-release fasteners and the other 3 sections being screwed into place.Īs far as those travel pods go, yes the first ones were unused napalm canisters. Externally it was the same tank as the F-15 but internally (plumbing, electrical) they were totally incompatible if you thought about interchanging them.įor building a belly tank roadster I think, the 2-piece tank would be preferable. The AF F-4 world converted to the "High-G Centerline Fuel Tank" aka: the "F-15 tank" in the early 1980s. The F-15 tank was good for as many Gs as the F-4 could handle. In flight the old tank was only good for 4 Gs when full. One big shit show when 600 gallons of JP-4 splooshed onto the ramp. The 2-piece design would fail at the seam and I saw one F-4 have a tank split in two while taxiing. ![]() Very different compared to the old-style oval shaped, 2-piece (front half, back half) tanks that bolted together in the middle. 3-piece construction, nose cap, straight tube body and tail cap. View QuoteBut those would be the "new style" centerline tanks, which are like F-15 centerline tanks. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |